Swaggy's Top Stonks - How to invest well in 2024

1. The wealth gap widens - and workers fight back

Income and wealth distribution have always followed a ​pareto distribution​, more or less. That's the 80 - 20 rule, which means that 20% of the people have around 80% of the cash. Putting aside whether that's a good or bad thing, it's as close as we have to a natural equilibrium.

But 30+ years of low interest rates, low taxes, increased automation and outsourcing, outsized executive compensation, and lower union participation have smashed the equilibrium.

Overall, the top of the table has increased its wealth by around 9% per year compared to 3% for the lower 50%. It may not sound like a big difference, but the compounding effects over three decades are significant:

• The 735 richest Americans have more than 10x more wealth than the bottom 165 million Americans.

• The three richest Americans are ​wealthier​ than the bottom 50%.

This trend will continue through 2024 and beyond.

• AI is getting better, which will continue to increase the ​productivity/median wage gap​.

• After a year of tech layoffs, blue-collar companies are shutting down and ​laying​ off workers. Many of those jobs won't come back when the economy recovers.

• I think Donald Trump will win this year.

Investors (the wealthy) and execs (also the wealthy) will prosper, but the bottom 50% will be out of luck.

What's a plebe to do? ​Organise!​

High-profile strikes in the entertainment and auto industries in 2023 were just the beginning.

There's going to be a big uptick in union activity in 2024 as workers begin to see the handwriting on the wall.

Again, there will be winners and losers here. Union leverage will degrade as the labor market erodes through 2024.

How is this actionable?

If you're an investor, you want to do more diligence on the labor situation before you back a company.

Ideally, that company will be in the automation space or will be ahead of the automation curve in its own industry.

If your job, investment, or company relies on a supply chain, check out your vendors' labor situation before their employees go on strike.

2. Invest in AI - no, not like that

Working with AI right now can be super frustrating.

You get ​hallucinations​, incorrect translations, and all kinds of other nonsense.

But training yourself on AI while the eggheads are training the models themselves is a fantastic investment. Even now. Even when it's a crap experience.

Because when the models get it right, we're going to see a Cambrian explosion of new skills, platforms, and investment opportunities.

And you don't want to spend six months learning how the stupid thing works while your competition -- however you define that -- is compounding their advantage.

I write (at least) eight newsletters a week, and I use ChatGPT (or Perplexity, or TextCortext, or, or, or) every day to help me produce the best possible content as efficiently as possible. Sometimes it helps, sometimes it doesn't, and sometimes it makes my job harder.

But when someone gets it right, I'm going to know about it first. And I'll be putting out the best content and introducing our community to the best investment opportunities before anyone else.

What's your equivalent of that? And what advantage would that give you?

How is this actionable?

I'm thinking about curating and sharing my learnings with a specific focus on using AI to become a better investor.

If 100 of you commit to paying $20 a month for this, I'll do it.

3. Housing price discovery will be a helluva drug

Let's revisit the wealth gap for a moment.

The most popular counterargument to my thesis goes like this:

Noah is dead wrong. This is why:

First, the data ended in 2022 -- America is a different place today.

But the bigger problem with believing Americans are richer than ever is that the vast majority of that wealth is locked into homes that no one will / can buy, and homeowners can’t / won’t borrow against.

It’s imaginary wealth from an asset whose value is inflated because of a lack of price discovery.

A lack of inventory has artificially propped up the residential real estate market over the last year because no one wants to dump their 2% mortgage in favor of 7%.

While I don't know what's going to dislocate the supply constraint, it can't last forever.

At some point, the ​housing affordability index​ will come back to earth through a combination of decreased interest rates, increased housing supply, and reduced home valuations.

When that happens, all that imaginary wealth Noah's applauding will evaporate.

That's going to be a big problem for American consumers who will find themselves in breach of their mortgage covenants, out of work (see #1 above), and under the yolk of a ​historic amount of debt​.

How is this actionable?

First, I wouldn't go anywhere near residential real estate investments.

Second, I'd look hard at a short position in BNPL megastar ​Affirm​. This company is a ticking time bomb.

4. A vibe shift in contemporary art

At the end of last year, I presented ​an investment opportunity​ to our accredited investors. (make sure to ​let me know​ if you're accredited if you want to get similar stuff in the future).

There's going to be more like this in 2024. Let me explain:

I was chatting with Nicho, our art broker, in December, this is what he had to say:

“Taste is currently swinging away from loud one liner art and towards more earnest artists. Less factory, more the hand of the genius. Artists who toil for their craft rather than party in exclusive clubs. So Koons and the YBAs might slowly be seen as more and more naff, whereas artists who live/lived for their work, like Frank Auerbach and Agnes Martin, become more fashionable.”

He goes on

“Until very recently, the art world was run by Western men at every level (the buyers, the galleries, the museums, the academics, etc). This has all been rapidly changing, and the effect is a revisionist history that the art market is adjusting to. However, it’s a big adjustment and has a long way to go.”

I find that the safest way to benefit is to not try and find artists who could have made it had it not been for these structures but the ones who did make it, but their market didn’t reflect their prestigious history. So, for instance, Bridget Riley (92 years old) gained a CBE in 1975, she is represented by the biggest private gallery, her auction history is extensive, and she has had many retrospectives at the world's most famous museums. Yet her market value is far less than that of a male artist who has achieved similar accolades. So a strong floor with a high ceiling.”

I find this argument compelling and is part of a broader trend away from a narrow White Dudes Only view of what's good.

The investment opportunity I mentioned earlier fits into this theme, and I think there's going to be a lot more to see here.

Let's compare the recent print price history for Bridget Riley (all data from ​MyArtBroker​)...

and Tracey Emin...

to Jeff Koons...

or Damien Hirst...

or Banksy...

You can see a clear trend here that's going to accelerate as the art world's power structures become more diverse.

How is this actionable?

You're in luck because we've written about art investing a lot:

• ​The timeless allure of fine art investing​

• ​Alts Academy: How to Invest in Art​

• ​The Do's and Don'ts of Contemporary Art Investing​

• ​Investing in Modern Art: Bridget Riley and Frank Auerbach​

DISCLOSURE: We own pieces by Riley, Auerbach, and Hirst and plan to buy more.

5. Seed and pre-seed startups take flight

The GFC in 2008 threw out a tonne of unicorns:

• Airbnb

• Slack

• WhatsApp

• Square

• Uber

• Instagram

• Pinterest

• Venmo

• Coinbase

And lots more. That's because layoffs, worthless stock options, and a transformative tech (mobile) combined to make super-hungry entrepreneurs that devoured a new playing field.

We're going to see the same thing play out in 2024. The tech is different (AI vs mobile), but we've got fertile ground for the next crop of world-beaters rising from the ashes of a lot of mediocrity.

It'll be a combination of new ideas and battle-hardened survivors, and they're to have a monster back half of the decade.

How is this actionable?

I would go as broad as possible on as many emerging managers focusing on seed-stage investing and personal angel investments.